Prior to Ideate, she worked at a multinational company for four years doing general civil design on large infrastructure projects. Kate is a California licensed civil engineer with a BS in Civil and Environmental Engineering from UC Berkeley.
#Autocad civil 3d 2013 update path software
For more information on the software solutions, training and consulting Ideate provides, please visit the Ideate Inc. If you have never used Inroads or Civil 3D, I hope this opened your eyes to some of the key differences. Additionally, it depends on how you like to work. It depends on what your clients and colleagues are requesting and what other software you are working with. There is no need for a data sharing system, like Civil 3D’s data shortcuts. Sharing data, however, is easy because it is contained are separate files. It is a separate software that works on top of Microstation. Inroads is less dynamic and it is harder to learn to use because it is not integrated with Microstation.
#Autocad civil 3d 2013 update path plus
Another plus to Civil 3D is its integration with other Autodesk products. Civil 3D also is integrated well with the AutoCAD interface and commands, which makes moving from AutoCAD to Civil 3D easy. The solution to this is to create multiple files and share data using the data shortcuts. This is definitely a plus for Civil 3D, despite the fact that it can lead to large files that can crash. To sum it up, Civil 3D is more dynamic then Inroads due to all Civil 3D data being in the drawing. All of these separate files can make data management difficult. For example, if you update a surface, you will then have to open the alignment file that may be affected by the surface, and then update the alignment file. Having a lot of different files makes the software inherently less dynamic. You can create a project file that will open all relevant files when you want to work on a project. So at any given time, you need to have a minimum of 3 files open to work: the object file (an alignment for example), a preference file, and the microstation dgn file. In order to display any of this data in the dgn file, you need to have a preference file loaded. Both of these files are separate from the Microstation dgn file. surfaces and alignments both have a separate file types that are loaded into Inroads. It in a sense creates a path to data from another drawing for purposes of displaying.Ĭonversely, data for Inroads is contained in multiple files. Data Shortcuts are XML files that act as a pointer to the file that has the needed data. Civil 3D objects are shared amongst drawings through Data Shortcuts. You can create separate design files instead of having everything in one file and share that data.
That would create a huge and slow file that could crash the software. Of course, you are not going to want all of your data in one drawing, even if it’s possible. In Civil 3D, the drawing itself is a database which contains all of the Civil 3D objects. This leads me to another main difference: data management. This is why you can’t edit Inroads objects using Microstation. Essentially, all of Inroads data is contained in one of the many Inroads files, which are separate from the CAD file that you may be using. In order to edit an Inroads entity, you need to use Inroads commands. You need to open Microstation and Inroads in order to work with Inroads. Inroads, however, feels like a separate software from Microstation. All of Inroads functions are contained on the Inroads window, which is separate from Microstation.
Civil 3D objects can be edited using the common AutoCAD commands. All of the Civil 3D commands are placed amongst the AutoCAD commands. Civil 3D’s integration into the user interface makes transitioning from AutoCAD to Civil 3D easy. This highlights the first main difference: integration with the CAD platform. Civil 3D is seamlessly built into the AutoCAD interface while Inroads is a separate window. Inroads works with Microstation while Civil 3D works with AutoCAD. They are both vertical design software built on a CAD platform. What is more interesting is the difference in their architecture. I am not going to get into the ins and outs of what they offer. They both create civil design objects such as roads, utilities, surfaces, etc. Now that I have as much experience with Civil 3D as Inroads, I’d like to illuminate for you some high level difference between these two competing software, specifically integration with the CAD platform and data management.Īt a glance, Inroads and Civil 3D are seemingly the same software. Recently, it got me thinking back to my design days as an Inroads master. Over the past year, through Ideate, I have been training Civil 3D to Caltrans employees. Posted on OctoAuthor: Kate Ming AutoCAD Civil 3D, AutoCAD
0 kommentar(er)
